Come on man, you can't tell me you re-read that without thinking that it was showing at least a little favoritism to Adams... Yeah, you're right... I can understand that. And obviously, I do think Mike Adams is a better pitcher than Jeff Bennett. But if the roles were reversed, I can honestly say that I would have blamed Adams for the runs. The other thing to note is that Bennett didn't have it at all tonight. He couldn't find the strike zone. The two hits Adams gave up were lucky... neither was hard hit, and they both could have easily been outs (and the grounder from Guillen could have been a DP). That doesn't absolve Mike of his responsibility for getting the job done, but the performances of Bennett and Adams were night and day. Like I said, Bennett walked two guys, and it was Adams who allowed them to score. Bennett didn't pitch well, but Adams sure didn't get his job done either. He hung a few sliders, but he didn't get hurt with them. The results didn't get the job done, but the *process* did. Adams got a grounder and a blooper... short of striking out those two guys, he did what could be reasonably expected. The fact that the Angels hit 'em where we weren't meant that those two balls were singles instead of outs. That's all I'm saying. At least Adams made the Angels beat us, whereas Bennett just handed them a pair of walks. For the record, I didn't see the game, but was listening at work. Myself and all of my co-workers were completely in agreement with the way Yost handled the pen and made his in game moves (Grieve hit for Bennett, etc). The execution was poor and the result wasn't a win, but Yost did set his guys up to succeed.... they just didn't do the job themselves. That I can't agree with. The Grieve move was good, obviously, but that's a separate issue. 1> Was Kieschnick ready to pitch? Apparently not. I don't know when he got back or what kind of emotional shape he was in, but at least some of the blame for his meltdown needs to go to Ned. That was a high-leverage situation for a guy who in all likelihood just got off a plane, hadn't thought about baseball in days, and was thinking about his new baby. This is really a minor quibble, though, and Brooks deserves 90% of the blame. 2> If you have Mike Adams and Jeff Bennett both available, which do you choose for a high-leverage situation? I'll take Adams, and Yost took Bennett. I disagree. He also didn't have anyone warming to begin the inning, trusting that Bennett would be fine, and after the first walk he got Adams up. That gave him only one batter to get ready to pitch, and Yost brought the hook. I can't disagree with yanking Bennett there, as he was obviously not going to have any success tonight, but he definitely rushed Adams into the game. Again, that's a small issue... the major concern is with the choice of Bennett over Adams. 3> He didn't use Kolb to face the heart of the Angels' order. This I won't get too worked up about because few managers would, but Kolb should have been the guy when we needed to face Guerrero, Anderson, Guillen, et. al. Not Bennett _or_ Adams. They could have pitched the ninth against the bottom of the order. Yes, the players deserve the blame for not getting the job done. But at the same time, I'm very surprised that you don't take issue with any of Nedley's moves. Do you really prefer Jeff Bennett to Mike Adams in a high-leverage, game-critical situation? EDIT: Good night Peavey, BTW. I'll be better in the morning, I promise... crappy day + crappy game = ornery Bill. http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/wink.gif ~Bill