i have more solid evidence than hearsay from someone on a website (which of course, you could conclude is all i'm doing, but nonetheless)... also, how does me repeating what the mlb said and what tom h. said constitute slander? other than saying the suspension was for steroids, which if you look above you'll see tom h. printed on his blog, i've said nice things about the guy... i still think he's a good prospect and a good person, i just think we are being misled by other sources