I don't understand all of this either. As I mentioned in the new lead, I think we're about to learn. http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/smile.gif I'd have to figure that these suits go beyond simply offering similar features. As an example, Android offers a cool voice control feature. Before iOS5 and the iPhone 4S, Apple's smartphones and tablets also offered a voice control feature. I believe that technology was licensed from Microsoft. Apple now offers Siri. I think that here, we're talking about features with similar purposes that have different underlying technologies. Obviously, these disputes have to entail something other than simply offering a function. My interpretation is that they seem to have to do with allegedly using a patented technology without permission, using a similar name for a feature, or copying artwork. Then again, what do I know? I think it's interesting that rather than Android itself, the hardware makers are the are the key players. Yesterday, Microsoft announced that "more than half of the world’s ODM industry for Android and Chrome devices is now under license to Microsoft’s patent portfolio." The big exception seems to be Oracle's lawsuit against Google. That's targeting Android itself. I think this may pose a far greater danger to Android than anything that might come from Apple.