It's been a while since I gave the articles a thorough reading, but don't think that was Jeff's point at all. I think his main point is to show how the ERAs of #1, #2, etc. fell into place when compared to other teams. Along with that, he's assuring fans that they shouldn't necessarily be pushing the panic button when they see a #4 or #5 starter with a 5 ERA. In most cases, there's more that goes into aligning a rotation than simply 'who's better'. You'll see some factors listed in the Setting Rotation After Break thread. Keep in mind, too, that ERA isn't a very good stat for ranking pitchers. There's too much margin of error. Jeff was able to use it in his article because the samples were extremely large. If you want to have some fun with it, though, I guess you could look at current ERAs and note that our guys fit in approximately this way: Sheets #1 Capuano #2 Vargas: #3 Suppan #4 Bush #4 You've got to go well beyond ERA in making this evaluation, though. Ks, BBs, and previous seasons' stats go a long way.