We should recognize the HOF for what it is: a collection of people whose character we can generally assess as average, but who were really good at baseball. True--but if a player's baseball playing performance has been enhanced because of unlawful and unapproved drug use, then what is that player, really? We know that drug use can have positive physical results for a player. Is it right to honor A-Rod or Manny or Palmeiro for being really good at baseball when we have evidence that says they enhanced their bodies in ways that were unapproved? We know their baseball records would be less had they not enhanced themselves, right? Character is difficult to measure, except when it's not. You can shrug it off, or take a stance that you're not going to judge people for their off-field actions, or whatever. . .But why would you ask the HOF to honor guys who did things forbidden in baseball?