1) At what point are these guys humans, and at what point are they property? Greinke would be a good example of this. I've seen fans at many sites complain about the accessibility of players, that they are not particularly friendly or won't sign autographs. I believe if a player is contractually obligated to fan interaction, then that is his responsibility, otherwise, it can really only be my expectation that he will perform on the field. It's nice when guys are personable, but not expected. This is obviously only one aspect of this topic, it can be taken from many different angles. How long is too long to stay away when your wife gives birth? What if there is an illness in the family? What is the player's obligation to the team over self? You and I get sick leave and the like, why shouldn't they? I understand the importance of each game, but is there a line? I would consider Greinke's case to be unique, as his medical situation is well known. I expect that players conduct themselves in ways that positively represent themselves and the Brewers organization. They can't sign every autograph, or pose for every picture--people shouldn't expect that. But they can act with basic courtesy--and fans can act with courtesy toward them, too. The birth thing is a hard one, since they get so much time off from November to February. But, people don't always plan pregnancies--so who am I to say? Is a week enough? Ten days seems like a lot, but maybe not. I guess the same with illnesses--unless it is a spouse or child, then I would be much more forgiving. 2) The hometown discount. I see this a lot, not necessarily here all the time, but in many forums. Fans feel that the team that drafted the player should be given special treatment. This is interesting to me, because I think it varies by situation. Mike Piazza, to me, owed the Dodgers a hometown discount. They drafted him in the boonie rounds as a favor. They gave him his shot, that he most likely would not have garnered otherwise. Should he sign for far below market? No, but it is my feeling that all things equal, consideration should be given to the team that got you here. Just my opinion, could be wrong. Guys like Prince Fielder, Ryan Braun, etc. don't really owe the team anything, IMO. They were high picks, that would have been happily scooped up by the teams immediately following. The Brewers didn't do them any favors, they were going to make money regardless. I also find it interesting because, it would seem in any negotiation that the arrived upon salary would be the lowest amount that management had to play to keep their asset. I don't know of a ton of teams that pay extra for players just because they like them, obvious exclusion of Derek Jeter. We agree. Free agents are free to do whatever they want. Milwaukee is a fine place to live. But New York is, too. If they feel comfortable in a small market and if they want to accept less to play there, then they are free to do so. Or they can leave for more. No hard feelings. But they also have to know that fans have strong feelings about rivals. Regardless of how much I like Prince, if he signs with the Cubs, he gets booed until I decide to stop. Giants, Rangers, Angels, Mets--I don't mind. . .but the Cubs are hated. That's just the deal. 3) Professionalism. This one I find especially fascinating. We here constantly that these guys are professional, they should carry themselves in a certain manner. These guys are where they are because of a special talent at a child's game. Most are not highly educated, and many came from less than stellar backgrounds. This spans all sports. Newfound wealth from sports does not equate to professionalism. Pro players, for the most part, have lived their lives being the best around at their chosen game. From little league through the draft, they were the best. Entering the pros, they meet their counterparts. What prepares these guys to react to being not the best? Kevin Youkilis is a fairly well acknowledged hot-head, he gets angry over popping out in non important games, he's thrown tantrums. Sportswriters and teammates roll their eyes and comment on this, but seriously, what has prepared this guy to fail? He's always been the best. Doctors, lawyers, businessmen, are trained in etiquette. They have been taught how to maintain themselves in a professional manner. It seems to me that people assume the wealth of players should lead them to be professional. I expect them to be professional because they're wearing the local jersey. I don't want to cheer for someone who conducts himself like a dope. The same way I don't want to eat in a restaurant where I can hear the chef yelling in the kitchen. There really isn't much to etiquette. Just act like an adult. Bryce Harper acted like a punk early on, and I would hope that by the time he gets to the majors, someone in the Nats organization would coach him on how to behave like an adult. I don't think the money has anything to do with it. Just being a major-leaguer means you have to conduct yourself with professionalism. Harper's not going to be perfect--but you hope he's not doing the same stuff at 25 that he does at 20.