Not to be argumentative, but don't you think if you parse the numbers of any reliever and take out his worst outing, they will have a low ERA and their overall numbers would look good? I'm not sure what useful information that conveys. I could also do the opposite, and skew the sample to make him look particularly bad. If you go back to May 4, for example, he has 20.2 innings total, with 15 runs allowed, so he's essentially had an ERA of 6.50 since the beginning of May. Even if you were to take out his most recent implosion, as you have done, his ERA "drops" to 4.50. Loe has not been effective this season. I'm not saying he can't be an effective pitcher if used correctly, but to say that he has been good in his "not horrible" outings is something you could say about almost every major league reliever. My point is that people are acting like he doesn't belong on a major league roster. I disagree. I should have found a better way to show it(but it was 1am at the time) When he's used correctly he's a very effective pitcher(which RR has failed to do many times this year). To say he's "beyond awful" is just plain wrong. When he's not thrown in there 4 out of 5 days, he's a decent RP. Should he be the 8th inning guy? No. But I'm fine with him coming in the 6th or 7th every few days.