That's awfully best case scenario considering he'll be 34 next season and just had his lowest IP since he was 25. It might be a blip on the radar, or it might be the beginning of the end. He's no longer a power arm, more an above average arm, his average FB was 91.5 last season. I'm not sure how you can claim he's a bullpen saver, he averaged 6.04 IP per game last season, the season before he was 6.5, the season before that 6.03 IP per start. At this point in his career you're looking to get a solid 6-7 from him and go to the pen. I don't think it's necessarily fair to compare Oswalt against a #5 pitcher, but he's about 1 out per game better than Narveson on average. The biggest point you neglected to mention was how the team pays for him? The Brewers are already significantly over budget, around 10% so, even at an incredible steal like $6 million for next season could the Brewers even do it? Would Roy take a 1 year deal for that little money given his history? Oswalt was a very good pitcher, he's still pretty darn good, but he's also going to be 34 coming off his worst season. If you're going to commit multiple years which a pitcher of his caliber should demand, you'd better be sure he's going to maintain his current level of play over the course of his contract. I'm not one to project the best or worst case for a pitcher, but the assumptions you posted about Oswalt seem awfully best case from where I'm sittting. I'll hit on all your points. 1. Oswalt only wants a 1 year contract to reestablish his value on next years market. If it was a multi year deal I wouldn't want anything to do with him either but it's a different story on a 1 year deal full of incentives.2. I still consider a 91.5 mph fastball as a power arm. His fastball is right up with Cliff Lee (91.5) along with Chad Billingsly (91.5) and faster than Matt Cain (91.2), Gavin Floyd, (91.2), James Shields (91.0) and Jeremy Hellickson (91.0). I was watching some highlights from later in the year when his back wasn't bothering him and his fastball was at 93 and 94 consistently.3. I never said he was a bullpen saver I just said he would make our entire pitching staff better by pushing Narveson to the pen. I'm a big proponent of having two lefties in your pen and as of right now our top two options include a guy who hasn't pitched in a year and another who probably wishes he took 2011 off. I love Braddock and Parra's upside but I question their durability so adding another lefty to the competition can only be a good thing.4. I'm not quite sure how they would afford Oswalt but when we hear Attanasio talk about saving money away for special circumstances I can't help but think this would apply. How many times do you get a pitcher of this caliber looking for a 1 year deal roughly 3 weeks away from spring training? The fact that we've kicked the tires on Oswalt, Lee and Coffey tells me were not as strapped for cash as it really seems.