I find the discussion on streaks particularly interesting. Yes, players go through phases where they swing the bat particularly well and hence produce many hits. At the same time, I think we've all seen periods of time where someone was swinging the bat well and in a SLUMP. And vice versa. I do have some major league experience as I was called up recently in MLB the Show so I thought I'd share that direct knowledge. As far as "stat geeks" go, there are definately those that go over the top and muddle a good conversation. But I've been reading this board for years (though I don't post much) and I've learned more about the game of baseball reading some of these spirited discussions than I could ever explain. Some threads become unreadable to me because of the (in my opinion) overkill on stats. So...I don't read them. Other conversations on this board seemingly meander meaninglessly until they can be framed with some numbers that add base and substence to the argument. The reason that I don't post much is that I don't feel I often have much to add to good discussions as I'm one of the people who follow every game either on TV or the radio. I have a general feeling of who's doing what based on what I see and hear every day. I dig into the numbers from time to time but I'm the kind of fan who likes going to games, complaining about the manager and overreacting to winning streaks. So that's fine for me. But to say stat guys are pretentious or ruining sports is just ignorant. EVERYONE thinks they're opinion is right...I hope. The dichotomy in baseball is why I love it. I started taking my significant other this year who never watched baseball in her life. By July, when a certain SS would come up, she would mutter "He's not very good, is he?" And when Braun came up..."He takes too long to hit but he's pretty good."