With some of the Doug Melvin bashing, I just wanted to put a little perspective into some of the discussion. First off, I am not attempting to be a Doug-Melvin-apologist and I will concede is not the best GM in the business, but is in the upper half (when payroll constraints are taking into account). Those of you who remember Sal Bando and then the Dean Taylor years, there were some horrendous decision making. While it was regrettable that Melvin could not turn one of our players into prospects at the trading deadline, this is a far cry from the latter Bando years when he held on to Dave Nilsson and Hideo Nomo, because he didn't want to wave the white flag and risk losing attendance. Also, we are nitpicking whether or not there was a player or two in a particular draft that would have been better than we selected, while in the 90's we had between a handful and dozen of players who would have been better than our selection. In 1993 we had four 1st round selections (only D'Amico had a serviceable career for the Brewers). While Seitzer for Burnitz was a great move by Bando, he then handed bad contracts to players on the decline (Eldred, Valentin, Grissom, Burnitz), while Melvin has overpaid for the most sought after commodity -- starting pitching -- which is hard to get good contracts when about 25 teams could use a FA pitcher's services. Anyway, Melvin has not been great, but our organization is not a laughing stock (as it was about 2003) and while we are bemoaning the fact that we've been about one really good starting pitcher and/or closer short of being a playoff team during the past few seasons, and we are wasting away seasons of the best duo (Fielder/Braun) that we've had since Yount/Molitor in the late 80's-early 90's. It wasn't that long ago that a non-losing season was a big deal.