David, this is something that has been bothering me from the moment DM mentioned "Type A FA." Two words can sum up my counter-argument to this: Tony Graffanino. Now, some of you reading this may be asking "Don, what relevance does our RH half of the Counsellino platoon have to do with Linebrink?" Well... last year, part of the reasoning for acquiring Graffy, in addition to covering for an injured Rickie Weeks, was to get DM's hands on some comp picks. Other teams were well aware of Graffy costing them picks and so Tony wound up accepting arby with the Brewers and... *sigh*. Graffy obviously will not be landing the Brewers any comp picks this offseason. Now... with Linebrink, let's say he doesn't sign elsewhere and accepts our arby for the same reasons that Graffy was forced to. What could we wind up with next season? If we look at Linebrink's numbers over the years, we see a Tale of Two Scotts. You have Awesome Scott, who was awesome in San Diego between 2003 and 2005... and you have Meh Scott, who's been well, meh, for San Diego this year and last. Since he's not getting younger, it's reasonable to think that he could keep up with his current pattern of regressing towards league average. Yes, he could go back to Awesome Scott, but again, given his age and his past couple of years... I'm not thinking it's terribly likely. While (as of now) the bullpen for next year consists of Turnbow, Turnbow, and well, Turnbow, having another arm in there, especially one that isn't the relief equivalent of a Designated Rotation Stooge, isn't a terrible thing. But since Melvin did make it quite clear that one of the reasons why he made this trade was to get comp picks, the fact that the Brewers wouldn't get comp picks means that we gave up Inman plus two others for a middling middle reliever would mean that this trade's upside has taken a severe hit.