We could have traded Lawrie for a young pitcher I seriously doubt that. There are way more teams looking for young, cheap high, ceiling pitching than young, cheap, high ceiling middle infielders. Young pitching is typically more valued than young hitting so it seems very unlikely we would get equal value to Marcum in a deal. we could have traded Hart, Weeks, Fielder, etc rather than extending them or letting them walk via free agency. IIRC they tried to trade Fielder but nobody wanted to give up anything close to equal value for him. I suppose we could have traded him sooner but I fail to see how continually trading proven good players, under our control for multiple season's, for young, unproven talent really ever gets us to where we want to be sooner. I mean as soon as those guys get good, following your idea of what should be done, we trade them for some supposed perfect future scenario. A scenario that is less likely to occur the more times you trade a known commodity for an unknown quantity. The Brewers chose instead to use them to actually win the division and take a shot at the WS.