I don't understand baseball; are advanced metrics really that highly valued by front offices? Because based on his ERA/WHIP, Greinke only has one great season (2009). He doesn't have the same surface numbers as Santana/Sabathia or even Cain, so you have to really trust FIP/xFIP/WAR I guess to think the Cain contract is automatically the starting point (particularly since his free agency value will take a hit from Hamels potentially being on the market). Don't get me wrong, I like advanced metrics and think Greinke is one of the best pitchers in baseball, but I find it weird that there is such a consensus on his value being so high. (Won't even mention the absurd can-only-pitch-in-tiny-hamlets-like-Milwaukee amateur psychology.) I think 5/$100 is very realistic and by no means a low-ball from the Brewers. ERA/WHIP the three years before their big contracts: Matt Cain: 2.89/1.180, 3.14/1.080, 2.88/1.080 Johan Santana: 2.87/0.970, 2.77/1.000, 3.33/1.070 CC Sabathia: 3.22/1.170, 3.21/1.140, 2.70/1.100 Zack Greinke?: 4.17/1.250, 3.83/1.200, 3.32/1.230 (2012)