Seriously though, Gwynn was drafted less than 2 years ago (as was Weeks). The overreaction to these two fellas supposed "failings" has been a sign of not understanding many players would still be in low A ball. Putting Weeks and Gwynn in the same category is not particularly appropriate, IMO...though of course I realize this is more about Al trying to dismiss others and at the same time pat himself on the back than it is about logic. Like huntsvillefan, I find myself too weak to ignore this...as I clearly should. http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/wink.gif TGJ had a track record when he was drafted...he was not an impact bat at San Diego State, with little power and nothing like the offensive performance that Weeks had (all-time NCAA batting champ, etc). On the other hand, Gwynn was an excellent basebunner and defensive player in college, while Weeks had defensive questions. Last year Weeks was challenged in AA but was pretty good given the context of his league. Gwynn was in over his head by all accounts, even after you park-adjust. And it should be noted that it's possible to agree with the notion that Gwynn could be a good 5th OF and still criticize the Brewers for their choice of Gwynn and his assignment to AA in '04...and given some of the guys they passed up to take him, and Gwynn's record in AA, I think criticism in both cases is still quite valid. Especially given that Gwynn's .294 average is in the same one week sample that is later characterized as 'minute.'