So you want 2x or more than what Lucroy got, but with someone with half the value if that? That might be hard to pull off. On another note why should the Dodgers regret not getting Braun exactly? In all of the Dodgers NLCS losses they lost by 4+ runs. You honestly think Braun was going to create 4 extra runs over what they got out of their LFer in any of those games? Yah I doubt it too. Not sure if I'm reading this correctly but are you saying Braun is half the value, if that, of Lucroy? If that's what you mean then how is it that Puig + 2 very good prospects are coming back for Braun when we only got Brinson for Lucroy Well Braun's value largely depends on how much money one is taking back and that rumored return for Braun largely depends on the prospects that come in return. If those prospects were on the Cordell level then, yah, that isn't very good value. Before money is spoken for I would say Braun has half the value of Lucroy at best and once you eat some money maybe 75% of Lucroy's value...if that depending on what you think of Puig plus whatever those prospects are. Also keep in mind we are talking about the Lucroy-Indians deal not the Lucroy-Rangers deal which are very different. Point being Ryan Braun is not getting a package stuffed with more high ceiling young prospects than the Lucroy-Indians deal. Not even close.