Interesting. I think Chris Grinde, principal at SP deserves some culpability here. He obviously tried to cover his behind in the retraction. But why would Sauk Prairie try to inject themselves into this when he graduated from Stoughton. I know Grinde, and let's just say that I wouldn't put something like that past him. Let's just say he is a bit of a divisive figure. I never liked the guy, so I'm a bit biased. But that seems just like him to inject himself and the school into a national story and then when it's revealed that this was not the case, he goes into cover-my-tracks role. I could be wrong, who knows. Stoughton didn't make a big deal of it, perhaps because they did their own research and knew this was not the same guy.