I'm at my keyboard now, rather than my phone...so I'll give expanded thoughts.
In the lottery, i think you need to draft guys with one distinguished skill, at least. Burries is a good defender and scorer, I can see his game translating to the NBA. Ament is the right size. He's not a finisher, he's not overly athletic, he didn't shoot well. I know he has pedigree, but I don't see that one loud skill. Heck, I'd have rather had Reed from UCONN, he can rebound. Too many of those guys wash out. No one can predict what he'll be at this point, but his need to improve his body and learn basketball in a short period of time concerns me.
As far as the ceiling/floor argument. I think most solid teams are built by finding high floor guys. Super stars are unicorns...Giannis was a lucky find where he was picked. Typically you find your superstars in the first 5 picks of the draft. The key is then not wasting picks on chasing unicorns. It's finding rotation players who can be useful, or be useful trade pieces. NBA develops at a rate faster than MLB, you don't get years to find yourself. While there are exceptions to the rule, late bloomers are fairly rare. In MLB draft I'm much more about high ceiling, you can afford to miss. It's just too painful to completely miss in the lottery with the NBA.
Overseas teams are full of tantalizing draft picks.
I loved the AJJ pick a few years ago, I'm very surprised his game hasn't really translated. He's the type of guy I'm looking for all the time.