Umm, it's wikipedia. Does anyone regard it as a credible source? It can be. I used it to study a lot of historical stuff in college. I think there have been studies that show it's basically as accurate as encyclopedias. Obviously anyone can edit so at times, there may be something wrong or messed with but I believe they have people constantly checking pages to make sure everything is right.Agreed. The stuff I know about it's been accurate or the inaccuracies are trivial. Attempts to game it (Paul Revere really did ring bells and shoot guns, the Founders really did end slavery) usually don't last very long. There are a lot of scurrilous sites you can't care about but if something inaccurate is on wikipedia it is worth addressing, although a suit isn't worth it unless it's something like it sends your company's market cap down millions.