I really don't care that much about awards, but it's kind of sad that two writers - both from Tampa - left Verlander completely off their ballot. I mean, who picks JA Happ over Verlander? Happ had a nice year, but Verlander threw 30+ more innings (while leading the league), gave up fewer walks, had 90 more strikeouts (while leading the league), and having a better ERA, WHIP, FIP, and WAR (while leading the league). What did Happ have more of? Wins. In the end, Porcello had a fine year, so that he won isn't a big deal. I just wonder about some of the people that vote.