This Florida series -- wins against Beckett and Burnett, and a loss to a relative no-name -- got me thinking. I wanted to see if, in fact, there really was a pattern: do the Brewers actually bat worse against below-average pitchers? Do they bat well against aces? I compiled a list of games so far this year (128, nice round number), and along with each:         - The starter         - The starter's ERA on the year         - How many ERs the Brewers scored on the starter         - How many innings the starter pitched and compared how well the Brewers score runs against different levels of pitching. For the purposes of this post, I'll call this "the spread": If the Brewers outperform the league average against a pitcher, they "win" against the spread. So, on to the results... ERA under 2.50 Brewers 6-0 ats Brewers score 4.54 ER/9 ERA 2.50-3.00 Brewers 6-5-1 ats (the "tie" was against Anthony Reyes of StL -- this was his only start of the year) Brewers score 3.29 ER/9 ERA 3.00-3.50 Brewers 8-5 ats Brewers score 4.84 ER/9 ERA 3.50-4.00 Brewers 9-13 ats Brewers score 3.54 ER/9 ERA 4.00-4.50 Brewers 14-9 ats Brewers score 5.02 ER/9 ERA 4.50-5.00 Brewers 13-15 ats Brewers score 4.58 ER/9 ERA 5.00-5.50 Brewers 2-5 ats Brewers score 3.86 ER/9 ERA 5.50-6.00 Brewers 5-1 ats Brewers score 8.38 ER/9 ERA 6.00-6.50 Brewers 3-3 ats Brewers score 6.75 ER/9 ERA 6.50+ Brewers 0-5 ats Brewers score 2.70 ER/9 (the upper number in the ERA range is inclusive; lower number is not) So those of us who have noticed how the offense generated is inversely proportional to the opposing pitcher's ERA... not crazy at all, at least on the extreme ends of the spectrum. The 0.50 ER/9 divisions are rather arbitrary, but maybe someone with some better Excel skills than me can make some graphics. The spreadsheet I used can be found here. Anyways, it's certainly not the most scientific analysis, but it sure looks like there's a bit of a pattern there. Makes me wonder what psychological factors are at play...