Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Robideaux

Verified Member
  • Posts

    248
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Robideaux

  1. RHP Jimmy Nelson - Brevard County
  2. There is plenty to criticize Melvin for in terms of long term team building/planning. For me, the trade of JJ Hardy and the subsequent Yuni season is the prime example of where a lack of foresight put the Brewers in a bad spot. But as much as the Ramirez contract could become an albatross in two years, in my opinion we are in a win-now window. The team as currently constructed has a good shot at the playoffs in 2012. It is no guarantee, but there isn't another team in the division that is clearly superior. I don't know how this move impacts our ability to sign Greinke to an extension, but I do know that in an offseason where losing Prince was inevitable, the Ramirez move helps solidify what could have been a black hole at third. We will be better off at 3B and SS this year, so as long as 1B isn't a complete disaster, our offense should be able to absorb the loss of Prince. Chances are we will be rebuilding regardless of this move in a year or two by the time the Ramirez contract has a decent chance of looking bad, and at that point how much does it really matter? I lived through too many rebuilding years not to be excited that this move helps our chances of making the postseason this year. The Braun situation stings, but there is a lot to be excited about for Brewers fans in 2012. I can't tell others how they should feel, but I am happy to enjoy the ride.
  3. I started this thread on June 28. It is now September 28. Clearly, nothing is changing. I am now in the acceptance phase. Reluctantly.
  4. So to paraphrase, you are saying that because the 1981/1982 Brewers had a bad offensive player in their lineup and still made the playoffs, the 2011 Brewers should be content with having a bad player in the lineup (despite an obvious upgrade rotting on the bench)? To follow down this specious path, couldn't I say that the 1981/1982 Brewers prove that you can make the playoffs with a serious hole in the lineup but you can't win the World Series?
  5. Green is going to be a good player. Just hope Doug agrees...
  6. Every defensive metric hates Wright's defense, and the offensive issues can't be totally blamed on Citi. Could he bounce back to be a monster hitter again? Maybe, but the cost (both in terms of salary and what you what have to trade for him) would be prohibitive. He might--and it is no guarantee-play well enough to be worth his salary, but the Brewers would be better off letting Taylor Green play for peanuts and spend that 15 millions somewhere else. (SS perhaps?)
  7. Does anybody have any data on how a player's peak fastball velocity affects his aging curve, if at all? I did a little bit of digging via Google, but I couldn't really find what I was looking for (found article by Kalk and a few things over at Tango's place). In discussions about whether extend Marcum, there seems to be two main (and directly oppositional) arguments being made: 1. He will age better than "average" because he relies more on location and craftiness than a blazing fastball to get hitters out than 2. He will age worse than "average" because losing a few MPH off of an already below-average fastball will make it difficult to keep batters honest. My purely gut instinct is that how a pitcher ages (the shape of his aging curve) is more highly influenced with how good he is to begin with rather than his peak fastball velocity, per se. (Of course, there is probably a strong relationship between velocity and effectiveness as well, so it is hard to isolate each variable without a bunch of regression analysis that is beyond my pay grade.) I suppose a corollary of this is whether there is velocity threshold that pitchers need to exceed in order to be effective--and, if so, what is it? There almost assuredly is (you don't see too many guys throwing 65 MPH in the big leagues), but is a drop from an 87 MPH to an 85 MPH deadly in most cases or can pitchers compensate by throwing more off-speed stuff? For what it is worth, it looks like Marcum is using his fastball less and less as he ages and relying more on the change-up and (this year) the curveball.
  8. Back in January, I doubt we could deal them anyone in our organization but Braun and get them to trade us Desmond straight up. Why, though? Outside of one big half-season in 2009, he never hit well in the minors and neither the metrics or fan evaluations have him as a plus fielder. What am I missing?
  9. I don't know a thing about Desmond, but glancing at his stat line, he looks like Betancourt version 2.0. Is he really much of an upgrade?
  10. Casey McGehee now has an OPS lower than Yuni Betancourt and Carlos Gomez. Despite his so-so minor league track record, the extent of his struggles would have been nearly unimaginable at the start of the season. On top of his poor hitting, he is also a subpar fielder and one of the slowest runners (for a non-catcher) I have ever seen. There is something to be said for patience--for letting players work through tough stretches. One could argue that replacing an established starter after a poor month or two would not be well-received in the clubhouse. That said, the Brewers have the talent to make the playoffs this season, and right now, he is our weakest link. Casey is hurting the team both at the plate and in the field. Unlike for Yuni B, whose deficiencies have been discussed ad nauseum, we have a viable in-house alternative for McGehee in Taylor Green, who has been mashing in AAA this season. Although, there are no guarantees that Green would out-produce McGehee going forward, it is almost certain that he could perform better than Casey is right now. My question is two-fold: 1. Would you bring up Green to at least be the left-handed bat in a platoon? 2. At what point do you think the Brewers would make that move this season, if at all?
  11. Over his last 7 games, McGehee is hitting .227/.250/.273. He might be "looking better," but he sure isn't playing better.
  12. The record is good because the talent level is better than in previous years, but RR's in game decisions are hurting rather than helping. I don't judge a manager based on whether a specific move works or not, but rather on the decision-making process. For this, he gets an F. There is anecdotal evidence that the team likes playing for him. That's worth something, so I'll raise my grade to a D.
  13. Not to be argumentative, but don't you think if you parse the numbers of any reliever and take out his worst outing, they will have a low ERA and their overall numbers would look good? I'm not sure what useful information that conveys. I could also do the opposite, and skew the sample to make him look particularly bad. If you go back to May 4, for example, he has 20.2 innings total, with 15 runs allowed, so he's essentially had an ERA of 6.50 since the beginning of May. Even if you were to take out his most recent implosion, as you have done, his ERA "drops" to 4.50. Loe has not been effective this season. I'm not saying he can't be an effective pitcher if used correctly, but to say that he has been good in his "not horrible" outings is something you could say about almost every major league reliever.
  14. I don't think most people "fail to understand offensive production varies by production." I think most understand that a .288 OBP is, by your own definition of average, below average. I think below average hitting combined with below average defense makes for a below average player. Do some fans resort to hyperbole about the extent of how poor a baseball player he is? Sure. But the fact that some exaggerate doesn't make him good, or even passable. He is what he is--a below average hitter and fielder who happens to be our starter by the grace of Doug.
  15. I realize that nothing will dissuade you of your Yuni love, but I'm curious which part you consider thee pleasant surprise? The .293 on-base percentage? The .341 slugging percentage? The no range/ no errors fielding?
  16. I have a feeling this is one of those debates that will never be resolved. Bentancourt is a bad baseball player. Scouts say this. Fans say this. Baseball writers say this. The stats say this. A couple of guys on an internet message board have decided to adopt a contrarian position, either because they feel the level of hate towards Yuni is unwarranted and want to stick up for him or because they do not understand that the #1 thing that determines whether you are a good baseball player or not is the ability to not make out at the plate (OBP) and the ability to convert batted balls into outs in the field (which is a function of hands, arm, AND range). I kind of understand the former reason, especially if it is couched in "he's not good, but he's the best we got." The latter...well, no amount of evidence is going to sway them. Any argument that claims Betancourt is a good player is not based in reason, evidence, or logic, it is purely an argument based in emotion--and facts don't tend to win out over emotions.
  17. Why waste another reliever at this point? If you were going to blow another pitcher, do it before the game is over.
  18. I still want Everth Cabrera from San Diego (though I know it isn't going to happen). He's young, cheap, and blocked.
  19. I don't mean to be disrespectful, but you don't understand the stats you are quoting. You think you are being "objective," but the stats you are constantly referencing are little more than random statistical noise at this point. "Small sample size" isn't simply an excuse to ignore something that doesn't fit the narrative.
  20. I hear you, and I'm all for a detente on the whole Yuni debate, but if somebody starts a thread with the premise that Yuni is actually not that bad a defender or not that bad a hitter, it isn't that unreasonable for other posters to respond with evidence to the contrary. As far as I'm concerned, people can enjoy (or not enjoy) the Brewers in whatever way that makes them happy, but there is no rational, objective measure by which Yuniesky Betancourt is a good major league baseball player. Period. Exclamation point. If fans choose to believe differently, whether it is because sanctimonious stat geeks get under their skin or because their particular breed of fandom doesn't have room for objectivity, it is their prerogative—but they are wrong.
  21. I forget what game it was, but Betancourt almost got Weeks' legs taken out from under him on a force at second. He really left him out to dry.
  22. Haven't had the opportunity to read the whole thread (maybe some day when I have a spare 3 hours...), but I'm currently in love with just about everything made by Three Floyds, based out of Munster, Indiana. I moved to Indiana from Milwaukee a few years ago and they have it on tap in a number of the local establishments. My current favorite is Robert the Bruce,a deep reddish Scottish ale. Its been hard to find recently, though I'm not really sure why. The Alpha King is a pretty decent pale ale, well balanced, though not particularly memorable. I was mildly cognizant of Gumball Head, their wheat beer, prior to moving--it is one of the few wheat beers I will give the time of day to. I also had the opportunity to try Dark Lord, which is only available one day a year. Fantastically tasty, but not worth the hype (though what really is).
  23. I think Kottaras, if given the starting job, would put up an OPS of more than 700, which would be the highest by a Brewers starting catcher since Damien Miller. His OPS last season was right around 700 and that was with his BABIP barely above .200, which wasn't in line with his previous benchline. If everything fell into place, I wouldn't be shocked by a .330/.420 slash line. He hit 22 home runs in AAA a few years ago, so he has a little pop and we know he walks a lot. What I don't know is how bad his fielding is and how good his hitting needs to be to offset the fielding. I agree that Lucroy has more "potential," but I don't think it is clear that Lucroy is appreciably better as a hitter at this point. Either way, Nieves should be gone as soon as Lucroy is healthy. But, I'm terrified that Melvin will decide to keep Nieves.
  24. I think Jack Wilson would be an improvement (terrible hitter, but a good glove), but my impression is that the Brewers' powers-at-be don't see shortstop as a problem. If they did, they would have made more of an effort to bring in some competition for Yuni in the offseason. Between the shortstop situation, Kotsay and Almonte making the team, and Gomez batting second everyday, there has been a lot of head-scratching moments. I don't really understand what Melvin and the rest of the brain trust are thinking. (If I hear about Betancourt leading the Royals in RBIs again, I'm going to scream. )
×
×
  • Create New...