So you were expecting him to outperform his past three year averages all while getting a year older and coming to a more hitter friendly home park with an inferior defense behind him? Maybe your expectations were just too high to begin with.A 3 year average is fine and dandy for a player in their prime, but career trends are more important than anything else when trying to predict future success. For aging players, I really don't care at all what they did 2 years ago much less 3 years ago. In the end none of that has anything to do with how a pitcher will actually perform this season. We can project all we want, but when a guy stinks, he stinks. While we have to guard against over reaction, as the sample size to continues to grow, the more definitive conclusions we can draw. In Wolf's case, he's been very average since 2005, claimed to find something in Houston in 2008 to rejuvenate his career, and pitched well in 2009 for LA. Contrary to what's been previously posted, his peripherals do not line up at all. In 2009 his BB rate was only 2.4 while pitching for LA, the best mark of his career since 2004. His BB rate is currently 4.5. Since 2007 his K rate has been trending downwards from 8.2, to 7.7, to 6.3, and currently sits at 5.9. Yea we're only 2 months into the season, but when you look at his entire career, what recent season looks like the outlier? What do the trends tell you? I'm not going to say Wolf is finished, obviously I argued vehemently against both Wolf and Davis being signed, I've made all of these peripheral and stuff arguments before so my opinion remains biased. It wasn't hyperbole when I said that there was a strong possibility Wolf would be the worst pitcher on the staff by the time his contract was up, I wasn't exaggerating for effect, I've just never liked what I saw when examining him as a pitcher.