How does the 25 years prior have anything to do with the trade supposedly getting better? Acquiring Sabathia directly led to the the pitching situation in 2009, it wasn't wasn't the first domino to be sure, but it was the 2nd to last chance Melvin had to improve the rotation long term. Listen, you guys can have your playoff appearance. I get how much it meant to many of you, but don't revel in the failure of the prospects traded as proof it was the right move. The trade doesn't keep better because LaPorta hasn't hit like Braun and Brantley hasn't established himself yet. The Brewers still traded top prospects for a rental, it doesn't matter if both players get hurt tomorrow and never play another MLB game. I happen to like Cleveland, quite a bit actually, and I wanted the trade to work out well for both sides. People around here seem to forget that the Brewers wouldn't have made the playoffs even with Sabathia had the Mets not totally tanked for a 2nd year in a row, the Brewers did not control their own destiny. How would history view the trade without the playoff appearance, again regardless of how LaPorta and Brantley are playing? I'm still surprised how many posters aren't connecting the dots, looking at all of the trades that were made, the assets moved, to end up with the rotation we did in 2009. Be happy we made the playoffs 2008, but then don't whine about the rotation, and I think it's incredibly weak to root against the prospects traded. I can see people rooting against LaPorta for personal reasons, but Brantley was a classy young man that never did anything but work his tail off for the organization, and Byrson certainly didn't do anything to warrant anyone from Brewerfan to be rooting against him.