Once again, it's not that Brewers aren't able to afford Sheets, it's that should they meet the years on the contract that the big market teams can offer? The Brewers aren't going to be able to sign him for 3 years, a home town discount would be a 4 year deal, but the Yankees or whomever will just go 5 years. Sheets deal is going to be about money and years, not just money. Again, we aren't talking about next year, we're talking about paying him 18-20 Million when he's 36 years old. Power pitchers do not age well, and Ben is a 2 pitch pitcher, though he's been working on that changeup for 3 years now. I'm not mocking you, I just don't get why this is such a difficult concept to understand? We aren't resigning the Ben Sheets of 2004 with 264 strike outs, we're signing a very good pitcher who's beginning to decline. While his ERA is very nice, his K to BB ratio is good, and WHIP is good, I highly doubt he'll be pitching this effectively when he's 36. I can't think of one 36 year old pitcher worth 20 mil/year, and when you factor he has the weirdest injury history of any Brewer pitcher, it's a risk the Brewers simply shouldn't take in my opinion. Sheets has only pitched over 180 innings 3 times in his 7year career, while Sabathia has done it 7 times in 7 years. Santana started in the BP for the Twins but he's pitched over 200 innings each of the last 4 years. Why does this matter? Because I'd rather have a team like the Yankees make the mistake of overpaying for Sheet's ERA than the Brewers being handcuffed to a longterm deal for too much if Ben suffers another "fluke" injury. He just hasn't been durable enough for me to feel secure offering him the type of money and years the big market teams are going to be willing to cough up.