I could see how they came to that conclusion if they weren't looking at all the stats and were simply looking at the traditional counting stats: Bonds -- .322/.517/.724 (221 OPS+), 317 HR, 697 RBI Pujols -- .334/.427/.629 (172 OPS+), 366 HR, 1106 RBI There's also the considerations about defense to make -- for much of the decade, Bonds was too musclebound and old to play in the field. Pujols is still generally regarded as one of the better defensive first basemen in the game (although I haven't seen the metrics for his defense lately, so don't quote me on that). To be fair to Bonds with the counting stats, though, Pujols is playing in his 9th season of the decade, while Bonds only played in 8. Bonds never had many RBI opportunities later in his career, either. The year he hit 73 home runs he drove in 137 runs, which seems low to me when you're hitting that many out. And really, neither of them compare to the counting stats compiled by Alex Rodriguez. I don't have much of a problem with Pujols being considered the best of the decade...he's certainly gotten off to a hell of a start for his career, even if it's getting tiring seeing the media proclaiming him the best of this generation every chance they get.