I agree with you for the most part. The only problem I have with placing onus on Melvin is that he has done his job well in those 5 years. I say this honestly because I look at the numerous trades and key hires he has made that did indeed improve the club. The talent level has increased each year, while the results have not. The only thing I would say Melvin has done poorly is not realizing sooner that Yost is not cut out for MLB managing. Its hard to fault him there, because Yost has been able to hide behind a .500 season and injuries the last two years. But this year his flaws are glowing fluorescent yellow and orange. The decision should be an easy one for him. Now its only a matter of timing. I may have went too high on the food chain when I mentioned CEO. I may have been better served saying Vice President of Operation/Finance. Someone who can't explain their spending or efficiency variance may get the axe before the higher ups on the food chain get theirs. I respectfully disagree, it seems pretty contradictory in itself. What is your basis for saying that Melvin has done his job well over the past 5 seasons? As far as I'm concerned, generally speaking, a Manager is an extension of the hiring GM. Melvin wouldn't have kept Ned on this long if he didn't believe Ned was the right guy for this job. I don't know what numerous trades and FA signings you are talking about, because the last time I checked, we were still watching Mench, Cappy, Vargas, Soup, Graffy, Counsell, David Bell etc... The rest of the young guys we can all thank Jack Z. for, not Melvin.