If you believe it to be true, then you should be able to define what those qualities are that led you to that conclusion. And if you can define the qualities, they can be objectively tested. Maybe one day someone with the time, data and mathematical insight will be able to write it down on paper. That said, because an idea has not yet been put in a properly testable form does not mean that it is not so (though of course it also means that everyone is free to dispute the efficacy of the idea). Much of what we now see to be oh-so-simple in our world was made so only through the insight of people we now recognize to be of the genius catagory. Even with as much as we know, both in terms of investigative technique and the ultimate conclusions that can be derived from investigation, we don't know everything. I think there is a danger that we may sometimes become too complacent with the advances that we have made and that we may allow the huge amount of data we do have in front of us to blind us to the fact that perhaps we are missing more.