I was just making my previous post to kinda fan the flames a bit, but in all seriousness, your basing Sheets' status as a #3 pitcher based on injuries he no longer has and a mediocre start to the season. Sample size is a phrase bandied about on here a lot and one would think all of the posters would get it by now. Is JJ Hardy a better power hitter than Bill Hall? Hes got 2 more HRs and a SLG thats .081 higher. No sensical person would try to make that argument. Suppan and Capuano are solid pitchers, but people usually regress to their career norms(although Cappy being younger is much more likely to have a breakout season which doesn't do that). Sheets is also likely to be closer to his career numbers by seasons end. If all that happens, Sheets would most likely be our best pitcher, followed by Capuano, then Suppan(unless Bush can convert his good peripheral stats to on the field results, in which case, he'd be ahead of Suppan). Bringing up salary is also unfair. To be honest, I don't think a single pitcher on this team is overpaid based on what contracts looked like this past off season. Does Sheets get paid that much more than Gil Meche? Again, Id rather have Sheeter. The way baseball works is that players who have reached their free agent years get a heck of a lot more money than those that havent. Sheets has put in his time, and recieved some of that cash. So too one day, will Capuano, Fielder, Weeks, Hardy, and others. Many of them will probably sign deals we say are overpaying them, but that is the nature of the beast. Do we here overrate Sheets? Probably, but we overrate a lot of our guys. I wonder during a certain infamous thread how many of us actually wondered if Bill Hall could pitch. We also regularly put the trade values of our own players way over what they actually are. Its called being a fan, and when you visit a site called brewerFAN.net, I guess its to be expected. -Don