Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Posted

1) Is the correlation of a pitchers ERA and record better

than a correlation of a

2) pitcher teams run support and record.

 

hope this make sense.

 

I would vote for #2...

Recommended Posts

Posted

Common sense tells us that their correlation should be equal. ERA is essentially "runs scored" and run support is "runs against." Since ERA doesn't include unearned runs, run support might have a tad higher coorelation?

 

LINK

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

1) Is the correlation of a pitchers ERA and record better

than a correlation of a

2) pitcher teams run support and record.

 

Are you talking about indivual ERA vs. record, or team ERA vs. team record?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Given that

 

d(W)=0.10*d((1.0)*Runs For - (1.0)*Runs Against) or

d(W)=0.10*d(Runs For - Runs Against)

 

I would say runs scored and runs allowed would have equal correlation since they have equal coefficients.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...