but that's the whole point -- the reason Miguel Cabrera is an elite hitter is that there aren't many like him. Dunn's been a tremendous HR & BB guy, but that's not nearly as uncommon in more recent years. I didn't extrapolate any further on my post responding to the Killebrew/Dunn comp., because frankly I didn't think it'd be needed. While OPS+ isn't by any means a 100% determining comparative stat, it's useful in a quick & dirty sense. Check out where Killebrew stacked up in the two seasons gregmag cited ('67 & '69). He was routinely one of the 5-10 best hitters in his league, and maybe MLB -- he won 1 MVP & finished top-5 five other times. Dunn has certainly been a good power hitter, but he doesn't stand out amongst his peers in the same way that Killebrew did/does. How much a player stands out in the era(s) in which he played is, for me, a major determinant in HOF-i-ness. 40 HRs seems like a reasonable estimate for Dunn in a given season, so even though he might hit more than 40 this season, that's no given. Assuming 40 HR/season, Dunn wouldn't get to 500 until his age-35 season (2015). Even if he's able to stay healthy & productive enough to get to 500 by then, you're still looking at 100 more HRs to hit from age-36 & beyond. Dunn isn't exactly a picture of physical conditioning, so I think it's an incredibly long shot he'll reach 600. He is what he is, a player I feel has been undervalued by many over his career -- and certainly an impressively consistent producer. But he's not the kind of player that jumps off the page to me as a HOF candidate.