Every time my wife and I see a story on a dog attack, we raise our finger in the air and wait for the inevitable reveal that it was a pit bull. It's about 90% of the time over the last 15 years. I would not allow my 5 year-old within a mile of one. Right, just because the media reports on dog attacks like it does missing children: Pit bulls = cute little white girls You can't honestly be under the impression that 90% of dog attacks are by pit bulls. EDIT: To give my claims some teeth - "According to the Clifton study, pit bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks that were included in the study" (-- Clifton, "Dog attack deaths and maimings, U.S. & Canada, September 1982 to November 13, 2006") "The risk of attack from german shepherds, bull terriers, blue/red heelers, dobermans and rottweilers was four to five times higher than for other common breeds." (-- Thomson, et al., "The public health impact of dog attacks in a major Australian city" (Adelaide) January 1990 to July 1993) Also from the Thompson study... frequencies of dog attack, by breed: 25.3% - German Shepherd 13.6% - Bull terrier 13.6% - Blue/red heeler 11.7% - Doberman 9.1% - Rottweiler The notion that pit bulls are the one breed to avoid/that attacks at an alarming rate is, quite simply, a complete and utter farce.