Basically it is insulating to continue to claim that Betancourt was an upgrade over a much younger, more athletic, and more productive player when the evidence overwhelmingly supports the contrary view. In my view, Betancout 2011 > Escobar 2010, and it's not even close. I'm fairly certain that Escobar caused me to utter more curse words during a game than any Brewer since Johnny Estrada. He didn't hit at all, piled up crucial errors early in the season, mental errors on the basepaths, and basically conveyed an 'I don't care' attitude through his body language. Now in 2011, you may have a case, but that would be based on fielding alone. Escobar only hit for about six weeks out of the season. In my view, if he doesn't start hitting, he's not long as a starter in the league- I don't care how much leather he flashes.