You're going to have a lot of trouble convincing people that Salome and Lucroy couldn't do better than the .636 OPS and .290 wOBA that Kendall put up. I would never go to the trouble of trying to convince anybody of anything here. I know better. All I would ever do is present an opposing viewpoint and hope it gets people to think. Kendall is projected here to OPS .626 leading to a contribution of -25 runs, almost 2 wins worse than either Lucroy or Salome. Like I said before, I don't put any stock in the R/150 portion of those projections. 2 wins seems excessive. I just get the feeling that people are stuck in a "Kendall sucks, anybody would be better" mindset. I wouldn't argue against the first part, but am a little skeptical of the second part. Many people seem willing to believe every bad thing about Kendall and positive thing about the alternatives. I think we also need to consider what this team is shooting for next year. At this point we are probably looking at a low 80 win total. Even if we believe one of Lucroy/Solome would actually be 2 wins better than Kendall, I don't think it is worth using a year of service time just to get us to 85 instead of 83. I say sign Kendall to $1-2M for one year and worst case scenario, we cut him a month or 2 in and bring up one of the kids. Buys an extra year and has minimal impact on our overall win total.