What he isn't pointing out is that the Hall can do all of that without enshrining him. My understanding is that Rose is already very well covered in the museum, just as other non-enshrined players might be if they've done something historically significant (either positive or negative). But as I've said, the MLB ban and Hall eligibility are two separate things. I think the MLB ban has to stand. But if the Hall wants to change its stance on banned players and let voters decide on enshrinement, I'm open to that discussion. That seems a good rationale for letting in all the steroid users also.