Yost's failures don't merely date to this season, this rotation and this lineup. The idea that ownership would be acting hastily is erroneous, I think. There is a great body of work to attach to Ned, including a historic second-half collapse, last year's nosedive and a panoply of veteran players underperforming according to their historical numbers and prospects sliding into mediocrity. There are plenty of arguments made as to why the manager isn't as powerful an influence as knee-jerk fans like me think he is. Okay, I'll grant that. To me, that's the perfect rebuttal to the question, Why NOT fire Ned Yost? If the team is so endemically troubled, what are the great achievements that Yost brings to the table to justify keeping him? How could firing him hurt? If it's merely a cosmetic change, then you've thrown a segment of the fan base a bone. If it's a change that could bring results, then you've made an improvement. I don't think anyone, even the biggest Yost backers, think he's kept things from getting that much worse.