For God's sake, they were analogies, not 1:1 comparisons. I know that's a tough concept for some people. The point of listing the players I did was to show age, outside extremes, shouldn't be practically the sole cause for excluding a minor leaguer as a prospect. Fiers had his own circumstances preventing him being further along in his career at this point. He was 24 when he entered the system. Since signing he's moved up the ladder faster than most collegiate prospects. They weren't going to put him at the major league level immediately and tell him to sink or swim because he was 24. He had to conquer levels just like about every other minor leaguer. And he doesn't need to wind up being as impactful as any of the names I listed to be a prospect. As far as saying the Brewers have a good farm system, that never happened. I was simply defining what made a good farm system. It should be obvious, but apparently it wasn't if players could be left out of the equation because they don't fit rigid qualifications. For the record, I don't think the Brewers have a good farm system, or even an average one. However, the improvement in statuses of prospects like Green, Schafer, Peralta, Thornburg, and yes even Fiers, etc.; make it far from the worst as was originally claimed.