You know, this is something I simply can't relate to. Todd Frazier made the statement that he knows the owners have the money -- they just refuse to spend it. This is because he played in Pittsburgh and has experience not getting paid. What was one of the funny comments made after Soto was signed? He is worth more than the primary owner of the Brewers.
The fact that there isn't a salary cap (hard, soft, or otherwise), doesn't mean that there isn't disparity. From a economics standpoint, I don't see how it is possible for Milwaukee to have a 300M or 400M combined salary among the MLB players. They will be in the red every year. My understanding is the players are saying, "Too bad! You can pay, so pay up!" Would Milwaukee be able to survive on a 150M floor? I think it would be tough.
I also thought it was interesting that, according to Evan Drellich, the players union already has a lot of transparency with the Owners' books. As an owner, would I want my labor force to see every bit of information about my company? Of course not. Also, what difference does it make if I build some hotels next to the stadium (which was probably paid for by the local taxpayers)? The players simply want a bigger part of the pot... > 50%.
Oh, and how about profit sharing for the taxpayers. Hey Todd and Erik Kratz -- wouldn't it be cool if the tax payers, who paid for the facilities where you could work and make millions of dollars, would get some kickback? That won't happen because it will take a portion out of their pie.
Sorry for the rant. If a player wants to get paid more, then be better. Get yourself to the point where a bigger market team will pay 760M for you instead of complaining about making "only $750,000" a year (Source).