I'm at the point where I think going back to the pre-BCS system of individual polls choosing their national champion and having some years where there is a split champion is a better format than this CFP nonsense. No matter what happens this year and who leaves these programs for the NFL/graduation, next year's preseason polls will have Bama, Clemson, OSU, ND/Okla all somewhere in the top 6, which pretty much voids any chance a non-power conference has of finding its way into the top 4 teams. The Pac 12 is basically an afterthought right now in this process, and the Big 12 isn't far behind - so geographically more than half of the country doesn't even care about who wins the national title. The talent gap between the haves and have-nots has never been larger, even within the power conferences that continually send Clemson, Bama, and OSU and it's not healthy for college football to operate like this longterm. The SEC has enough talent where they occasionally have a team that can knock of Bama, but then those years it takes them losing multiple games to not make the CFP no matter what teams are doing across the rest of the country...CFP was supposed to be all about expanding opportunity but frankly it's limited it. Scrapping the system that all but guarantees the same programs wind up in the final 4 unless their marquee players get injured would hopefully push programs to consistently schedule tough non-conference games on neutral fields early in the year. Knowing there isn't what are essentially automatic bids into a field of 4 for the playoff could actually push teams like Bama and Clemson to maybe play each other in September to sort out what the polls should look like at the top before conference play starts - knowing that the traditional bowl system would likely not pair them playing against each other in January.