First: If the A's and Cubs doctors are friends, wouldn't it be customary for one to be willing to send the other more work? Only sort of kidding - I respect that Harden has made 13 straight starts, but when the GM that just traded for the guy is openly talking about giving him offdays and acknowledging how much of an injury risk the guy is, it seems to be more of a preemptive PR move for when (not if) Harden has to spend time on the shelf. Second: Beane tends to trade pitching away when its value is at its highest - I'm not considering the trade as a firesale at all. In fact, Beane probably makes the deal because he doesn't want to rely on a high risk/high reward pitcher to anchor the rotation and postseason aspirations. It doesn't make the A's markedly worse or better, but the trade does give them some roster flexibility, and gives them a second baseman to replace Ellis next season (or after the trade deadline) Third: Depends on who is defining the Cubs' top prospects. Seems to me like many of the hyped prospects in the Cub organization haven't amounted to much, and the 'minor' prospects that were traded away in deals end up being the solid ML players. Fourth: Bedard to the Cubs isn't going to happen, because I would imagine that Seattle would want Marmol as the start of any package for him - that is if they're truly serious about getting equal value to what they gave up to acquire him in the first place. The Mariners have about 8 other players they want to trade away before even dealing with moving Bedard, anyways. There are also about 15 other teams to have been rumored to have inquired about Bedard - many of which will be much more desparate to trade for a starting pitcher. I still think the big loser is the Cards in all of this, but they've proven resilient and good enough to stay close through 90 games already this season. With the NL as weak as it is, it will probably come down to head-to-head matchups between the 3 teams as to who gets two playoff spots (Cubs being an odds-on favorite for one of them).