Speaking for a moment as a forum participant and not as an administrator, I agree wholeheartedly with the quoted part of JJHardy7's post above. As if you all couldn't tell from my blue kool-aid avatar, I personally try to stay on the optimistic side of things (actually, I prefer to consider myself "hopeful"). I'll admit that I tend to tire pretty rapidly of gripes and sky-is-falling comments. But not all "negative" posts are like that. RockCoCougars, in his 1992-1993 thread, expresses concern about the 2009 Brewers, as many of us have done recently, but in a way that is thought-provoking and, for me, just a lot more interesting than brief comments like "they're punting for 2009" or "my worst fears are realized." (I'm not looking to call anyone out, just paraphrasing the kind of stuff I've noticed in the last week.) So it's not that there's no room at Brewerfan for negative thoughts. I personally would rather read well-thought-out messages, positive or negative, than anyone's negative splatter on the screen. There are multiple sites on the internet where people can go to just react with a keyboard about the Brewers. I'd prefer (again, speaking as a member) that Brewerfan be different from other sports message boards in that regard. I think other staff feel the same way, and I hope some other members do too. I agree with DougJones43 that the bigger problem may be uber-repetition by a subset of posters, and that should not necessarily preclude having a vent thread. I also appreciate that you realize the difficulty of the balance that staff try to maintain on the site.