This +1000. This is what i mean by sensing Stearns is gun shy. I mean none of us know for sure, but I think the perception that teams's asks for big name players is outrageous in most cases. I don't think that's the case at all. For example, it's not like the Rockies are going to say "Give us Hader for Story". The Rockies know that is never going to happen, and it would be disrespectful to even ask that from the Brewers. So, basing it on the assumption that teams aren't asking for playoff contenders best players(knowing that it's not going to happen), then to me, nothing is too cost prohibitive. You have to give to get. Besides, look at deals over the past years(for big names) and every time it seems when the details come out, the returns aren't nearly what most people expect they would be. In fact, typically far from it. Again though, you've advocated trading Turang, Mitchell, Ashby, and Small. Not 2 of them, or some combo of them, but all of them. The Brewers best chance to win a world series isn't going ALL IN this year by tossing all their chips on the table, it's being competitive for a number of years. The best way to be competitive for a number of years is by not trading ALL of their top tier of young controllable talent for a Trevor Story or Jose Ramirez for a one-shot run to glory. The same mindset would have seen us trading away Burnes and Woodruff, and yet, here we are.