Haudricourt promoting the awful no divisions idea. http://www.jsonline.com/sports/124139813.html?page=1 In order to be "fair" all teams would have to play as close to the same schedule as possible. This presumably would mean one 3 game series against each team in the other league, that's 45 games. That would leave only 8 games against each team in your own league to bring the total to 157 games. Whatever they would do with the other 5 games, I think there would be a lot of scheduling problems. If you play a team 8 times and want to avoid 2 game series, that means a 4 game series at each park, but then too many 4 game series are also difficult to schedule. If you play some teams 9 times then that probably means 6 at one park and 3 at the other, which does not really meet the fairness test, or you have an awkward 5/4 split meaning more 2 and 4 game series. With Divisions, you only have to have each division have the same schedule and we have several posts here demonstrating that it is easy to do this in a number of ways with an unbalanced schedule and 5 teams in each division and also retain the baseball tradition of mostly 3 game series. I like the divisional set up and having an unbalanced schedule. It's also been a model that has been successful in Football as well as Baseball...why switch to the model used by the less successful sports (NBA and NHL)? Competing in a league of 15, where the goal is to finish at least in 3rd and if you can't do that then try to finish 5th also just seems dumb.