The HOF and the voters continue to baffle me. The 4 voted in are fine. Would have voted for all of them. There's so many others deserving that are left by the wayside because of pettiness, bad assumptions, or just plain weirdness. I should know better, but I can't help it and the last week of January every year riles me up. It boggles my mind to no end how a voter would look at Trevor Hoffman, vote him in, and then not also vote for Billy Wagner. I've no issue with Hoffman being in. Wagner is simply a better pitcher across the board than Hoffman. Better ERA+, better FIP, better WHIP, 11.9 K/9 vs 9.4. Edgar Martinez deserves to be in and it shouldn't even be close. In a year where another specialist made it in, excluding him because he was a specialist that's been a legit position since 1973 makes no sense whatsoever. Go look at Molitor's numbers and then Edgar's. Other than counting stats, Edgar is as good/better in every one. It's criminal that voters are holding the DH against him. Likewise, holding "Colorado" against Larry Walker is silly. If only there were a statistic that adjusted for park effects of each player, alas, we'll never really understand if Larry Walker was any good. Wait, what's this? OPS+? A stat that does adjust for individual ballparks? Well I'll be. Well obviously, Walker will be proven not all that good here. I mean, HOFers have an OPS+ like Chipper Jones 141. Or Vlad's 140. Or Thome's 147. Walker must have been like 100 or something, right? Oh, he was 141. I'd have also voted in Clemens, Bonds, and Manny without question. I could go either way on Mussina, Schilling, Sosa, and Sheffield. I think a case could easily be made for any of them, I could also agree that they are very good, but not HOF.