Interesting stuff to think about, @sveumrules. My question is: How do these numbers compare to a "good" offense? Which then begs the question....what approach leads to a "good" offense?
Tampa Bay leads everyone in offensive WAR. Here are their numbers for the same stats:
GB% 17th
LD% 29th
FB% 4th
Oppo% 25th
Pull % 19th
Center % 5th
----------------------------------------------
A few others I found where the difference between the two teams was large (league rank in parentheses):
BABIP:
TB - .310 (7th)
MIL - .281 (24th)
OBP:
TB - .339 (3rd)
MIL - .303 (25th)
(and the Brewers walk quite a bit)
K%
TB - 22.5% (18th)
MIL - 25.7% (3rd)
------------------------
And looking at Plate Discipline:
O-Swing% (swings outside the strike zone)
TB - 33.2% (10th)
MIL - 29.8% (23rd)
Z-Swing% (swings inside the strike zone)
TB - 69.7% (9th)
MIL - 65.9% (28th)
CStr% (called strike percent)
TB - 15.8% (24th)
MIL - 18.2% (2nd)
CSW% (called+swinging strike %)
TB - 27.7% (15th)
MIL - 29.6% (1st = worst)
So does this all mean that the Brewers are watching good pitches get called for strikes? Maybe they need to be more aggressive? I have no idea. It's just one comparison to one team that has a good offense. There are different ways to be good on offense so a team like Atlanta might have a totally different profile.