What math makes .344 lower than .341? Crisp had higher OBP this year and since he's still in his prime (while Cameron's not), he's more likely to maintain that than Cameron is at age 36. Crisp hit better with RISP (.267 to .245), hit better with 2 out and RISP (.239 to .205) and Crisp didn't fade in September like Cameron (Crisp hit .375 in Sept to Cameron's .176). Did age have anything to do with Cameron's fade in Sept? I wouldn't rule it out. But beyond all the stats, and I have no doubt Al you could massage the stats to make a case for Cameron too, the key you are ignoring is the makeup of the lineup. With Cameron in CF in 2008, the Brewers scored 51 fewer runs than they did in 2007. A big part of that is because the addition of Cameron added one more high strikeout, low contact, right handed bat to a lineup full of them (Hall, Hart, Hardy, Braun, Weeks), which enabled pitchers to work around the one threat from the left side and go after the free swinging rest. That the Brewers ended up trying to counter this imbalance with a Craig Counsell speaks to the need for something in the lineup other than free swinging right handed bats. Now if you're okay with spending $13 million to bring back both Cameron and Counsell who combined will be 74 next year, fine. But I'd rather spend less for a solid player in his prime and lessen the need to have Counsell getting regular playing time and take 70 strikeouts out of my lineup.