The difference career wise between A-Ram and McGehee is microscopic. Both are slightly below average. I'm pretty certain JB was speaking about defense here. I can't imagine anyone trying to compare the two on the whole (offense and defense) as the same player. But I still don't see the point of the argument. Its not like football where you have dedicated offensive and dedicated defensive players. A players worth for baseball is always combined: Defensively: ARAM - McGehee - Lets call it a tie Gonzalez - Yuni - Here we have a clear upgrade. Gamel - Fielder - I'll call this a tie for the sake of the argument. But I think we can also say that Gamel has potential to be better and much better. Offensively: ARAM - McGehee - Career OPS: 842 vs 746 (note that ARAM beat that last year, Casey did not) Gonzalez - Yuni - 690 vs 682 - I'm going to call that a wash, despite YB's great ability for sac flies. Gamel - Fielder - 800 vs 929 - No, that isn't Gamel's career numbers. But I think its a fairly safe prediction. His career numbers present too small of a sample anyway. Average OPS is 777 vs. 817. Yes, we downgraded our offense. Do doubt about that. But improving our defense, especially at shortstop does balance that some. If Gamel does improve on defense at 1B, we probably end up with as much production one the whole as those three spots last year. None of that can predict what will happen this year (people having off years, new players in the club house, injuries, career years, etc...). But I think its reasonable to say that for losing a player of Prince Fielder's caliber (or caliper if you want to bring his waist into it), our team as a whole hasn't suffered a significant drop off like some want to predict. We might not win 96 games this year, but I don't think its a stretch to say we should be in contention for the NL Central again.