WTP, I agree that trading Weeks would be tough to stomach. I love the guy, and he is a very good player. However, after this season, he will have three years on his contract, which should make him more marketable than someone like Sabathia, who we "rented" for a couple of months. I also find it hard to believe that we will be able to afford Weeks, Yo, Braun, Ramirez and Greinke in a few years and still be able to pay the remaining 20 guys on the team. If that's true, I'd rather trade someone like Weeks now "on our terms," than wait until we are forced to trade him "on someone else's terms." Think of the return for K-Rod when everyone knew the Mets needed to trade him. If Green posts another .900+ OPS in AAA, and maybe fills in at the MLB level for an injury and hits well, kind of "proving" he deserves a shot at the MLB level, and if we could get a return in talent similar to what San Diego received for Mat Latos this offseason, we could essentially rebuild and remain a playoff-caliber team by trading Weeks and using the savings to extend Greinke. Monty, in my mind the Brewers core four moving forward should be Braun, Rickie, Gallardo and Greinke. As mentioned in my previous post, starting with those four and moving forward with solid and relatively inexpensive talent in the field with Lucroy, Gamel, Green, Schafer, Gindl and on the hill with Narveson, Jungmann, Bradley, Thronburg, Peralta etc... should allow the Brewers to afford those four players. Assuming Green does in fact prove he deserves his shot, I would look into dealing A-Ram after this season. Yes it won't be on our terms and we would have to eat some salary, but it will at least allow us to move the older, more expensive player between Weeks-Ramirez. You're probably right that one year of Hart wouldn't bring back a Teheran/Minor type pitcher, but let's say he can return a #3-type starter with a few years of service time remaining. We could have a rotation of Yo, Greinke, {Hart trade}, Peralta, Narveson, with a lineup of Schafer, Gindl, Braun, Ramirez, Gamel, Green, {top young SS}, Lucroy. There would be more question marks then we'd have if we keep signing $10MM players, but there's a lot of talent, and we'd have money to fill in gaps. Plus, we'd have a core of Yo, Greinke and Braun locked up, have most of the team under cheap contracts and could offer extensions to players who prove worthy. We aren't too far apart in our opinions of Hart. I like the guy but I am more apt to go with Weeks than Hart if I had to pick between the two. Let's say the Braves offered a Pastornicky and a #3ish type pitcher. I think we would have to strongly consider this as the system is bereft of SS prospects and I think the Brewers would be better served with a Rickie-Pastornicky-Gindl 2B-SS-RF combo than a potential Gennett-Machado-ish Prospect-Gindl combo. Note that I would only consider trading someone like Weeks if we got a phenomenal return, and with his contract and track record, I don't think I'm too far out in left field when I'm thinking something similar to the return for Latos, which was two top-50 prospects, another good prospect, and a young, high-upside pitcher, most of whom will be playing in the majors this year. Latos is in his final pre-arby year this year, so he has additional value of being young, good and inexpensive, but Weeks will have three years of control, is still not old, and has a proven track-record. Brettac said it best...Weeks is probably more valuable to us than he is on the market. I think we would be very underwhlemed in what we would receive in a Rickie deal as I don't think we would get anywhere close to the package Latos brought. If this is the case, I am more apt to continue with Rickie and make him a Brewer lifer and fill the rest of the lineup in around him and Braun by dealing other expensive everyday players like Hart and Ramirez, even if we have to eat a little of their contracts.