The Brewers scored a run in the bottom of the 8th to push the lead to 4. Entering the top of the 8th the Brewers were ahead 9-6. Counsell was giving garbage outings to Barnes early. However, Barnes has clearly been one of the more effective pitchers out of the bullpen so far. Counsell putting him in a game in a hold situation against a team 1/2 game behind in the standings with Martinez, Carpenter, Goldschmidt and DeJong due up is a high leverage situation. The thing that always has annoyed me about the foolish "closer" role is, wouldn't it have made more sense to have the #1 reliever pitch against these guys? But that's another discussion. I'm not exactly sure what you guys are saying. If it was a 7-6 game, Hader likely would have had the 8th and 9th. In a 3 (or 4) run game, you give Barnes the ball and KNOW that you have Hader to come in if things go south and you probably still get the win. If you bring Hader in right away with that lead and he gives up 2 or 3 runs you probably still have to keep him in the game AND risk losing the game AND lose Hader for the rest of the series. That's a whole lot of bad things that could happen if you plan on Hader for 2. With Barnes, you might slightly lower your chances to win the game but will still have Hader for today or tomorrow.