I have to agree. Just because they didn't take the guy you like doesn't mean they made a bad pick. All of the first 4 guys have high upside, and that's really all you look for when you're picking 27, 28 and 38. Roache if healthy might have been in the top 15 and Coulter (though some are more down on him than others) was rated as the best high school Catcher. Haniger may have been more of an unknown to US, but to the scouts he profiles as a RF with power and a good eye at the plate. If he sniffs that projection then I'll be ecstatic, whether there was other players we thought were 'better' or not. The MLB draft is by far the most subjective of all the professional sports drafts because of what others have mentioned. This isn't a bunch of players that have been seen week in and week out by people on TV/in their local stadium. These are guys that get almost exclusively seen by SCOUTS. Who get paid to grade players out, unlike us who look at THEIR scouting reports and a crappy handheld camera video from behind the backstop of the guy. That's why you see Keith Law bashing the Brewers picks and others praising them. It's ridiculous, particularly for Law who will inevitably be WRONG on 75% of his top 50 rated guys. I'm not personally happy they didn't take Gallo or Smoral with one of their first 3 picks either, but I embrace the Brewers choices and honestly I don't give my hopes up on ANY of them. They could all be HOF'ers or they could all be busts. That's why grading drafts immediately after they occur is absurd.