I think Lawrie playing well at 3b surprised everybody though. The Blue Jays took a gamble putting him at 3B and in the limited amount of games he played, it worked pretty well. Pretty sure everybody saw him as a no glove big bat guy, with the potential to improve with the glove. That's what the Brewers draft when it comes to bats, they draft big bats with no glove. All they care about is the impact bat, not a gold glover, so for people to keep saying they mismanaged because they put Lawrie at 2B is ridiculous to me. Where would you put him? He can't play short, he's not a 1B, he couldn't cut it at C, he didn't seem to have the intangibles to play 3B, and he couldn't play CF. So that leaves him with two spots, corner OF (which when he was drafted was blocked for a long time) and 2B (which was up in the air until this past offseason). Hindsight is just so 20/20 for all of you guys. You think because the Jays took the risk of putting him at 3rd and it worked, that the Brewers made a huge mistake not doing it. And whoever was complaining about Brantley, I find that a bit short-sighted. You probably didn't care at all when he was the throw in piece for CC, but now you care because Brantleys playing good? Anyone in the Brewers system in the past 10 years that has had a "position crisis" has been one of those all-bat no glove players as I mentioned. Weeks, Fielder, Braun, Gamel, Lawrie, etc. I don't believe that's the Brewers fault